Towards an Understanding of Cultural Appropriation in Rewilding

cultural appropriation rewilding
Racist Appropriation Fail.

Dear White Rewilders,

I’m white too. Clearly. No hiding that fact. I have pale skin, blue eyes, and a lot of facial hair. If you are reading this, you are probably white too, as this letter is addressed to you, and the majority of the rewilding community is, at the time of this writing, white. While I (and maybe you) don’t identify as a white imperialist, or identify with “whiteness” at all, I live in a culture of white imperialism and I receive all the benefits of living as a white male in a white imperialist culture. As a white rewilder, I have often been accused of cultural appropriation by both Native and Non-Native people alike. Some of these accusations have been true and some false. The more I learn about appropriation, the more respectful and learned I have become. Rewilding is so important to me, and to our future, that I want to do whatever I can to create deeper connections between Native people and Non-Native people as we rewild. I’ve traversed this road for a while now and learned some things that can help us all work together more effectively. This is an open letter about cultural appropriation, how to avoid it, educate yourself on it, and learn from other cultures in a sincere and respectful way that will create collaborative partnerships. This isn’t a definitive guide. This is an intro to a never-ending conversation about this topic that we need to be having regularly.

[For those randomly reading this: Rewilding is a subcultural movement of people returning to, or attempting to re-create, pre-industrial, pre-agrarian cultures and lifeways of hunter-gatherers and/or horticultural societies. Rewilding takes inspiration from the most modern interpretations of prehistory provided by anthropology, archaeology, and ethnobiology. It is an anti-civilization critique that encourages the un-doing of empire and the culture of occupation. We believe that civilization (not to be conflated with civil societies) is inherently destructive, has caused the sixth mass extinction, and is currently in a state of long-term collapse. We are a niche within a niche within a niche. Here in the Americas, the dominant, popular culture continues to rob and mine Native Americans for everything they can, while continuing to treat them like they no longer exist, or only exist as historical stereotypes. It makes sense then, that if we want to rewild, to create sustainable cultures, to reclaim the inherent indigenousity that exists within everyone, that we need to create understanding between rewilders and the Native cultures that have lived here in this way for time immemorial. Most importantly we need to tread lightly and learn how to be respectful, and mutually beneficial as we rewild.]

I should make it clear right out that I am not speaking for Native people. I’m speaking along side them, and sharing what I have heard and learned from close friends and strangers alike. Native people speak for themselves, if you listen. However, they do get tired of having these conversations over and over again, so I thought I would address them from what I understand. Also, I’ve been told that white people tend to listen to other white people so it’s important for us to talk to each other about these issues as well.

I have made my fair share of insensitive, racist mistakes. I was raised in a white, liberal household in Portland, OR. Growing up on television shows like South Park, it seemed the standard fair to make racist, homophobic, and anti-semetic jokes–so long as they were done in an ironic or sarcastic way. Around the turn of the millennium I moved into my first apartment. I threw a house-warming party and told my friends to come dressed as “Cowboys and Indians.” Yes, I threw a Cowboys and Indians party. I’m not quite sure what the hell was going through my head. I think maybe there was supposed to be a subtext of irony (like we were making fun of people who would throw those kinds of parties by throwing one ourselves)… or something. It’s worse than that though. I set up a poker table in the living room and thought it would be funny to have a sign over the table that read “No Injuns.”

Humor is important for bringing sensitive issues to light… but… Not only is it offensive to stereotype Native American cultures into a costume, it is insanely offensive to mock the racist, genocidal history of our culture, and especially as a white American male, still reaping the benefits of white male privilege in an on-going occupation. They are allowed to make jokes about it, I am not. Of course I’m not. Imagine if I had a “slave and slave-masters” themed party, encouraging people to wear blackface, then hung a sign up that said “no n——s.” Thinking back on this makes me feel like a complete idiot. I bring this up because there was no ill intent, I was simply ignorant. I’ve learned my lesson since then. My embarrassment at that (and other things) fuels me to educate people who may be just as ignorant as I once was (and still am in a lot of ways-> implicit bias is ingrained in us all). We all make mistakes. The idea behind this discussion is to be able to expand our empathy, recognize our shortcomings and ignorance, and build deeper, stronger relationships.

Originally, the term cultural appropriation was synonymous with cultural exchange. A culture taking on a cultural element from another culture. Now, cultural appropriation is synonymous with cultural theft. This is because the majority of cultural appropriation has been done through coercion and violence, rather than a mutually beneficial exchange. The “dominant” culture has used this dominance to steal and water-down and transform cultural elements from every culture it engages with. Because of the broader context of appropriation happening all the time, many people look at rewilding and see cultural appropriation wether it is actual appropriation or not. (Side Note: there is certainly white privilege/fragility in rewilding, but I’ll tackle that issue in another essay. While it relates, it’s a separate issue in and of itself).

If you do not have Native ancestry and live in the United States and engage in rewilding activities, you, like me, are an orphan or refugee (or “settler” or “newcomer” from the decolonization perspective). We have lost our cultural roots, or rather, they were destroyed by Empire so long ago that our more recent ancestors assimilated and then destroyed other’s cultures around the globe. We have lost the grounding force of our indigenousity; cultural relationship to place. While we may have deep personal relationships with our place, we do not have a cultural one rooted in 10,000+ years. We are here as a result of empire. There is no ancestral homeland to return to for us. We must grow roots wherever we have landed, and we must do this with respect to the Native cultures here so that we don’t just end up as neo-colonialists. I’ve come up with a list of methods for steering clear of the disrespect caused by cultural appropriation, as well as systemic stereotyping and racism, while rewilding as a non-Native American in the Americas. I’ve been told by some that I am overly cautious, and I’ve been told by others that I’m not cautious enough. Some of these things may apply to non-white people, but as I am writing this from my own experience, I am only addressing what I know. First and foremost…

1. Do not copy Native Americans.

Copying Native American’s is almost always offensive. One of the biggest reasons not to copy Native Americans is because you are probably not copying them, you are probably parodying the stereotypes that Hollywood and the mainstream media have perpetuated for a few hundred years. This has been called “Playing Indian.” This is something I experienced first hand in the Boy Scouts of America’s “Order of the Arrow” ceremonies where boys wore plastic mock headdresses and read in a stuttered voice from a script, mimicking the hollywood-created portrayal of Native Americans.

Here’s the thing: there isn’t one Native American culture, there are thousands. Each of these cultures has unique languages, art styles, beliefs, customs, etc. It is important to recognize the diversity of Native cultures, and not stereotype them as a singular cultural unit. For example, saying something like, “The Native Americans believe…” is nonsense. “Some of the Chinookan people I know believe…” would be a more accurate and representative statement. I’m guilty of this one more often than I would like to be. I generalize sometimes because there are cultural practices (we will look at some later) that span the globe. I definitely need to work on this one though. I’m relating my personal experiences with this to show you that it’s okay to make mistakes, it’s okay to be honest with yourself, and it’s okay to share this information.

Don’t refer to Native Americans in the past tense. They are still here. I’m guilty of this one too. Already I’ve had to rewrite a lot of this essay for doing that. Part of the reason is that often times I’m reading or writing about the practices of pre-contact Native cultures and many contemporary Native cultures have been transformed through colonization and genocide, and have lost much of those practices that I am learning about. I think more often though, it’s just subconscious ignorance on my part.

Another reason not to copy Native American cultures is because often times people appropriating do not understand the history, origin, or importance of the cultural element they are appropriating. The classic example of this in Pop Culture today is when hipsters wear the “Native American Headdress.” Pop culture thinks it is okay to steal a cultural element because it’s just “art.” The headdress usually pictured or worn by pop stars is specific to Lakota Culture (remember there isn’t one Native American culture), though many cultures around the world had and have variations of feather adornment. When a pop star (or anyone) wears a Lakota style war bonnet without earning it, it is considered insanely disrespectful. It would be akin to wearing a war metal like a Purple Heart just ’cause it looks cool. You earn a Purple Heart for acts of duty during a war. Similarly, the Warbonnet has a rich meaning that I can’t do justice explaining, but you can read about it here. How would people react if everyone started wearing Pope bonnets to concerts?

Another reason not to copy Native Americans is because you may be idealizing them. Native cultures are human cultures. That is to say, they are not perfect. They are just people. They are not superhumans simply because they are Native to North America. It makes people feel awkward and uncomfortable when you arbitrarily put them on a pedestal.

I say that the copying Native Americans is “almost” always offensive, because there are certain times when it is considered “okay.” When I was a teenager I participated in sweat lodges at Wilderness Awareness School that were led by a Lakota elder named Gilbert Walking Bull. He taught us songs in Lakota and we would sing them in the lodge. He told us that the lodge was for all people. In this particular instance, a Native elder felt compelled to teach non-Native people his traditions. It was okay with him. It was not okay with all Lakota people. This is a gray area. One way you can navigate this gray area is to not advertise or tell people about it. Keep it to yourself. If you were to leave and start your own lodge, and call it a Lakota lodge, this may be viewed similarly to telling people you have Native American ancestry when you do not. Some non-native people have explicit “permission” from their Native teachers (I’ve heard of some teachers demanding their students) to go on and teach certain traditions to the world. According to many Native elders that I learned from in my teens, In the 60’s and 70’s many Native elders began teaching white people skills and traditions because their own Native youth had no interest in learning them, after being stigmatized for centuries through colonialism. They were willing to share their culture with anyone who was interested in authentically learning it. This still continues in places today, although seemingly less so. Some tribes hire non-native people who have learned these skills from elders, to re-teach them their lifeways that they no longer have a memory of. Again, this is a gray area. Just because one person in a culture gives you permission to do something, or a tribal government hires you to teach something, doesn’t mean that everyone who identifies as a member of that tribe will think that it is okay. This is the complex terrain that we all traverse. Always mention the tribe and name of the person who taught you, and who gave you permission or asked you to teach. Give credit where credit is due. Keep in mind that you will never get a pass from all Natives. That may not be a concern of yours, or your Native friends.

I came across this myself when I began to learn Chinuk Wawa at the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde office. A few of the teachers gave me permission to teach the language outside of the tribal office as long as it was for free. So I did. However, someone caught wind of this who didn’t feel the same way and began to spread rumors about me being a cultural thief. So I just quit teaching it outside of the tribal office all together. If I wasn’t a public figure with a reputation to uphold, I may have just gotten a little bit more quiet about it and kept teaching, per the request of my own teachers. But really… Why? It’s not my ancestral language. Is it any of my business? No. I’m not some White Savior (See below). Now I simply assist when I can, and where I am needed (if I am needed at all) and continue my own studies at the tribal office. I don’t really speak much wawa outside of the office. Why would I?

A non-native acquaintance started an ancestral skills meetup group in Portland. He had been going to Chinuk Wawa classes for a while, and decided to call the group “chxi-siwash.” What he thought he was saying was “New Native.” This is bad for a few reasons. One is that the word he used, “siwash” is the derogatory version of “sawash,” the word he meant to use. One is akin to the “n” word in English, and the other just means “Native American” or “Indian.” Even if it wasn’t just blatantly offensive on grounds of using words from a language you are not fluent in, and isn’t your ancestral language to begin with, he used the most derogatory term in the entire language. Whoops! This is a great example of why to keep things to yourself, and not create web banners for public groups in a language you are not super fluent in. But also, calling yourself a “New Native” is not great for a couple more reasons. First of all, you are not a Native. Second of all, you never will be. Not in that context anyway.

Authenticity plays a huge role in how you will be viewed when you emulate Native cultural elements. If you are actually interested in learning how and why certain things are done, and show respect, it’s often not really a huge deal. Wearing a Lakota Warbonnet clearly shows no respect for the tradition. If you were respectful of the tradition, you would learn the history, importance, and significance of that item… and you would still never get to wear one. So just stop doing that.

Part of authenticity or sincerity, is just showing up, and not teaching yourself skills in a vacuum. For example, don’t teach yourself a native language from a book (as if you really could anyway). Show up. Again, when I was learning Chinuk Wawa, people would ask me to translate a sentence for them for things like political slogans at protests. I was instructed by the teacher to say, “Come to class at the tribal office and ask the class. Learn the language so you can write the slogan from a place of sincerity.” How many people get tattoos in other languages that don’t really mean what they think? There are entire websites dedicated to this. It’s the same kind of thing. Wanting a piece of an exotic culture because exotic things are cool. That’s not very sincere. Sincerity is key. Especially if you plan to practice things and are given permission to, outside of the tribal context.

Another important factor is your relationship to a particular culture, and to particular people. If a stranger sees me emulating a particular custom (such as speaking in Chinuk Wawa) out of a tribal context, that has been taught to me freely by Native people, in my experience they will view me as a cultural appropriating asshole. This is because they don’t know me, and white people doing indian things is suspect for the reasons I have listed already. This makes it a very difficult subject to be presented and discussed online, as the majority of interactions are impersonal and with strangers who don’t know the context in which a tradition was passed on (and often don’t ask). This is another reason to keep it to yourself and do not broadcast lessons you have been taught. Acquaintances that see me emulate a particular Native custom, are more likely to question me as to my motivations. To friends, they don’t even ask because they already know my intentions. Again, this is why I mostly only do actual Native American traditions with Native people, and only as a participant or supporting role. Unless they ask me to do more (keeping in mind that other Native people may not want me to).

These things are also big “no-nos”: Do not give yourself a Native American name. Do not ask to be adopted into a tribe. Never claim to have Native American ancestry if you don’t. Do not sell items with appropriated words or images. Do not use the term “Neoaboriginal.” It’s just a sneaking way of saying “New Native.” You’re not a native. New or old. Even if you are given permission to learn and or share a cultural element, think deeply about why? Why is it so important to emulate Native Americans? Especially when you could just…

2. Research your own ancestry.

You don’t have to copy Native Americans to rewild. It’s sad to me, that some of us of European decent are so far removed from our own indigenous ancestry that we steal from Native Americans.  Our own heritage is awesome (before the iron age at least)! This is one reason why I think white people romanticize Native Americans and want to be like (how they have been taught to perceive) them: they have no idea that they themselves have indigenous ancestry.

Personally, I’ve always felt uncomfortable learning Native American customs, or participating in their cultural activities. It feels grossly voyeuristic to me. I once participated in a Chinookan Winter Gathering during which songs were being sung around a fire in a cedar longhouse. It was deeply moving and I cried. Partly because it was amazing to see people continuing their traditions after everything civilization has done to silence them and partly because I felt a deep sense of sorrow and longing to connect to my own longhouse culture in Scandinavia, but also feeling like that was not really my place either. I don’t fit in here, I don’t fit in there, I don’t know where I fit in. This is why we are orphans. We need to sit and feel that loss instead of trying to fill the hole of grief with other peoples customs.

It makes sense that we don’t know much about indigenous Europeans. Most of the books written about human history are about the earliest colonizers. Colonizers more or less invented literacy, so of course there is going to be a lot in there about how awesome they are and how “barbaric” the “savages” were who lived in surrounding areas. Through some of these texts, modern anthropology, and archaeology, we have gleaned quite a bit of information about how indigenous “white” people lived. In reality, “whiteness” or pale skin is actual very new to the world (only 7,000 years). The concept of “whiteness” even newer. Unfortunately, it now seems as though it is a marker of our domestication. DNA tested from the skeletal remains of the original hunter-gatherers of Europe had darker skin and blue eyes. The current theory is that our skin changed to white when we changed to an agricultural diet because of the lack of nutrients. Paler skin allows for the absorption of more vitamin D from the sun.

We’ve all heard the term colonization, but what we don’t realize is that colonization began with the rise in agriculture. Agriculture originated in the middle east and moved up and through Europe. I say “moved” but we don’t really know how it happened. Most theories say that hunter-gatherers “adopted” agriculture but I have a hard time believing that, since no other cultures in the world have left the hunter-gatherer lifestyle for farming. It’s an old myth that with modern concepts is a hard sell. I’m guessing there was genocide and drugs (wheat/grain addiction)… but that’s a whole other conversation, and I’m not a professional archaeologist. Based on the resistance to agriculture by hunter-gatherers in all parts of the world, I can make an educated guess though, that if someone were to do more research, they would unearth (pun intended) clues that point to a less pretty picture.

Colonization became what we know of today as Empire when it was refined into a Science by the Romans. Rome is known for many things, but in reality they really only invented one earth-shattering thing: the very first professional army. Before the Roman Legion, armies were make-shift groups of people. There were no professional soldiers. This army was paid for with taxes. Taxes that were enforced with the armies. The first mafia-like scam! Labeling all other people as “Barbarians” and creating a fear-mongering mythos of propaganda around them the Romans colonized Europe and stole the wealth of the cultures there, literally destroying villages and building Roman occupations right on top of them. Historians have given these people many names (the Celts, the Germans, the Gauls, etc) their own names for themselves long ago stamped out by Rome. The Romans did such a good job of erasing the cultures of Europe, that we still know very little about them.

The word colonization comes from the word Colony. The word Colony comes from the Roman city Cologne, which was a city Julias Ceasar built after wiping out a tribe of Germanic peoples. It was a military headquarters for the Romans, allowing them to tax more tribal people deeper in Germania.  Cologne came from the Roman word “Colere” which meant to “till the soil.”

Unfortunately, another person already did a lot of research into the Barbarians, but twisted it into an excuse for a genocidal rampage; Hitler. Hitler ruined germanic heritage forever. Just kidding. But seriously; tread lightly there. When you do this research, you realize that our indigenousity wasn’t taken away so long ago. It feels closer, more attainable. You’ll be amazed by…

3. Our ancestral commonalities.

In my study of prehistoric cultures from around the world (mostly Europe as my ancestors are from there, and North America because I live here), I’ve found that what we commonly think of as stereotypes of Native Americans in the United States, are actually just stereotypes of indigenous people everywhere. These commonalities can be a great place for starting cultural collaboration. The following list is of 10 of the most common activities that are practiced by many different indigenous cultures around the world (including indigenous Europeans), but are often mistaken as being solely Native American in origin.

• Tanned Leather & “Buckskin” Clothes & Shoes

Humans have been wearing the skins of animals, and particularly those of the deer family, for thousands of years all around the world. Now, if they were styled in the specific way of a specific culture, that is appropriation. The Loin cloth and leggings pairing has been in use worldwide. Pants were originally invented by “the barbarians” of the Eurasian steppe.

• Bows and Arrows

The earliest bow every discovered was in a cave in Denmark.

• Long, braided hair (particularly on men)

The Greeks sculpted statues with braids. The Bible discusses it’s hatred of braids (another form of colonization against “barbarians”).

• Feather Adornment

Feathers have been part of human fashion and adornment for a long time. There is now evidence that points toward Neanderthals using feathers for decoration.

• Face and/or Body Paint.

Most commonly referred to as “War Paint”, painting ones face with colors is something humans have done for a long time. The Picts were a Celtic people who are recorded as having painted their faces when going into battle with Rome. This idea was used in the film Braveheart, though the Picts were wiped out centuries before the era of that film.

• Drumming

The Irish Bodhran is very similar looking to many of the Native American drums I have seen. It’s an ancient way of making music.

• Shelters: Conical Shelters, Longhouses

Portable, cone-shaped shelters made of long, tree trunks laid or lashed together and then covered with a shingle of bark, animal skins, or plant fiber are used around the world. The Tipi is one form. The Sami use the Lavvu. From the Vikings to the Haida to Vietnam, the Longhouse is another kind of shelter than spans the globe and many different cultures.

• Wild Foods

Many foods have relatives that span the globe such as acorns, salmon, deer, cattails, nettles, and many more. These plants and animals have had (and continue to have) cultural significance in many cultures spanning the northern hemisphere.

• Sweat Baths

Humans have been heating up stones, bringing them into a small space, and pouring water over them to create steam for a long time. Herodotus reported about them to the Greeks on his adventures with the Scythians, the nomadic Eurasians living outside of Greece.

• Animism/Totem or “Spirit” Animals

Animistic beliefs and totem animals have long been a part of traditional cultures around the world. From Scythian tattoos to NW Coast totem poles.

This is a much abridged version of a longer piece I am writing on this topic of material culture similarities (as well as some spiritual beliefs) among different traditional indigenous peoples from around the world. Please forgive the briefness in this section, as its more important to recognize all humans have, and have had, things in common in all of our cultural ancestry. Each of these commonalities have similarities and yet distinctly unique cultural stories and ideas that go with them. We are all similar, yet distinct. These similarities are where I believe we can find common ground in our ancestry.

However, imagine if I wore my buckskins, braided my hair, wore feathers, painted my face, put a bow and quiver of arrows over my shoulder, lived in a conical shelter, and spoke about sweat baths and totem animals. Aside from my beard and the color of my skin and eyes, I would be the spitting image of Hollywood’s Native American stereotype. Perhaps these stereotypes arose because they were superficial commonalities among Native cultures throughout early contact. They may be superficial, but they are still commonalities. Anyone looking on in the Americas may laugh and tell me that I am “playing Indian.” This is very problematic, but completely understandable.

The way through this is to recognize our privilege. Though we have tons in common if we go back far enough, we we’re not the original wild-tenders of this land, and our more recent ancestors plundered this land and attempted to wipe out the cultures here. All the information about edible plants and sustainable land management systems of these regions were done by Native Americans, and this looks like where the most cultural appropriation would come from: Natives teach us everything about living sustainably in this place. Once you recognize this, you’ll also…

4. Recognize what we owe Native cultures and their people.

Like it or not, acknowledge it or not, privileged white rewilders in North America have a debt to pay off. Our ancestors attempted to destroy these cultures, and now we continue to reap the benefits of that conquest. I believe that was terrible and I would like to undo that damage to the extent that I can. If that’s not enough, than think about this: Everything we know about restorative land management of native ecosystems that is blowing up right now in the field of ethnobiology is coming from them. A larger portion of the “primitive skills” movement that is part of rewilding, was born out of archaeologists learning from Native people in the 70’s. Rewilding is about giving back. What can we do to give back to our teachers? To their cultures? To the land? They are one in the same. In your quest to give back, don’t forget to ask what they want and or need. Make sure to…

5. Beware the White Savior.

There is a term called the White Savior. You’ve seen them in Pop Culture: Dances with Wolves, Avatar, Emerald Forest, etc. The white savior is the idea that “native people are in trouble and need a white man to save them.” Native people don’t need to you save them. Go ask them what they need. Don’t think you know what they need. Ask. Keeping in mind that, sometimes, their struggles are just none of your f*cking business. Keeping in mind that sometimes, what they ask for may not be what you think they need. That’s not really the point, is it?

6. Be aware of your privilege.

This doesn’t mean you have to feel guilty, or that you haven’t experienced oppression through intersectionality. It just means you should have the filter in your head that the things you are doing to rewild were (and still are), until very recently, outlawed and stigmatized for Native cultures through generations of oppression and genocide. People were beaten to death for speaking their language.  Just keep that in your head when navigating this world. We (white folks) live within the culture of occupation…

7. Native culture and land is still under siege. 

Native people live on the front lines of occupation. While we can work cushy jobs awarded to us through privilege and save up to buy land (stolen from them by the empire) for our permaculture/rewilding projects, many Native people are struggling for even simple resources (like clean water) that we take for granted. The genocide is on-going. Keep that in mind.

8. Not all Natives want to return to their pre-contact way of life.

Many of them do not want to rewild. Many of them may not even know that’s a possibility, because it probably isn’t for them. Many are fighting just to exist. Their choices are not really my business either. My business is in learning how to live sustainably here, and how to give back to the people and land. That may mean assisting them to simply have access to resources like clean water, heating in their homes, health care, etc.

9. How to be an ally?

This is the trickiest part for me, because… there is no one right way to be an ally. I’m still muddling my way through this one, and probably always will be. This is the edge of my ignorance, my arrogance, and my implicit bias, and so I feel a bit like walking on egg shells. I don’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings, or be disrespectful by saying something ignorant (again), especially on the internet. But really, it’s okay if I or you say something ignorant, because we are. The only way through this is to allow yourself to be ignorant. If we listen, we can move through that. I think the most important thing is to begin to educate yourself. I’ve included a few resources below. It is important to start building relationships with native people. Make friends with diverse opinions. This makes it less about “allyship,” which feels to me like knowing how to help strangers (which is good, but impersonal), and makes it more about knowing the needs of a friend and community (making it personal).

Everyone is “entitled” to reclaim the lifeways of their ancestral people, but not with entitlement mentality.

Native people have to put up with this shit every day. Wouldn’t it be nice if you could help them out? Wherever empire may have kicked us to, we can still find our way back. We are all human after all. We are all from the earth. Doing this with “entitlement mentality” is counter intuitive to reclaiming indigenous ancestry and lifeways. As a white person, you are not entitled to pillage indigenous cultures and use their culture to your own liking, willy-nilly. “Well, my ancestors wore buckskin too. I do what I want.” This kind of behavior just makes you a jerk.

Every person on the planet is a potential friend. By being nice and learning to respect others, you are opening the door just a little more to make more friends. I screw up all the time. It’s okay to screw up. Just apologize and change your behavior. I’m constantly checking myself. This can feel tiresome at times, but in the end it’s the appropriate thing to do. If I can make more friends, create more partnerships, build collaborations, simply by learning to see people in a different way, and changing my behavior to welcome them or have them welcome me, I want to do that. If we are going to grow as a culture of rewilding, it will require all of us to be more open and respectful toward people we know and love, but also the strangers who may become the people we know and love.

Conclusions

I was tabling at an Earth Day event for my organization Rewild Portland. We had our English Ivy baskets out on the table for the display. An elderly Native woman came up to the table with a look of disgust on her face. She sneered at us, and said in a condescending voice, “You should come to the reservation and see how real indians weave baskets.” Then she walked away. I wanted to run over and explain to her that these were European style baskets, woven with invasive species that were pulled to restore habitat for native plants of the Northwest. Then I thought about the context in which we live; that my more recent ancestors attempted to destroy the Native cultures of North America, and I am a benefactor of their continued occupation. Though it is not my “fault” it is a legacy that falls on me. There is a lot to atone for, but not everyone is looking for atonement. Some people will hate me no matter what, and really, they have every reason to. Who can blame them? Later that same day, another elderly Native woman came to the table and excitedly picked up our baskets, “Wow! I love what you guys are doing!” I was a little nervous and responded quickly with, “These are European style baskets made with invasive species so that we can restore–.” She cut me off, “No, I get it, I get it. I think it’s so fantastic. Have you done any work with Native people in this area? I’d love to pass on your information to some of the local organizations that work with Native youth. Is that okay? I’m an elder so they have to listen to me, haha!”

There are no steadfast rules. I’ll say again, this isn’t a definitive guide. It’s a the jumping off point to make this a regular conversation in rewilding. How can we show respect for one another?

I owe most of my understanding of cultural appropriation to four groups of people. The first is my friends Shusli and Eugene who ran a Native American radio show on KBOO for many years. The second is to Eric Bernando and the Chinuk Wawa language community at the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde’s Portland office. Reading Adrienne K’s Native Appropriations blog was very helpful for me in hearing a voice that is specific to this topic. Martin Pretchtel is someone who has influenced me in many ways, this topic in particular. I am so thankful to these influences and continue to listen and be thankful for them, and many others, as I navigate this territory.

***

Resources & Readings:

What is cultural appropriation?

When Culture is Commodified

Native Appropriations Blog

Indian Country Today Media Network

Terry Jones’ The Barbarians

Reel Injuns Movie

Urban Native Americans: What You Need to Know to Be an Ally

 

 

Rewilding is Not Survivalism. So Why Do People Confuse the Two?

rewilding is not survivalism

Hunter-gatherers lived horrible, short lives, aimlessly wandering the landscape in search of food to quench their ever present hunger, just barely surviving… Or so the myths of our culture would have us believe. These myths are so pervasive, that they infiltrate all aspects of rewilding. Both outsiders looking in, and those new to rewilding, often conflate wilderness survival skills and survivalism, with rewilding. This is partly because we think of hunter-gatherers as “surviving” the horrible reality of nature, rather than living comfortable lives deeply embedded in a culture that takes care of them with ease. Later, when we realize that hunter-gatherers weren’t starving to death, the thinking goes, “Hunter-gatherer’s aren’t barely surviving… they are experts of survival!” This is faulty, as it still sees hunter-gatherers through the lens of “survival.”

Survival, in the context of “wilderness survival,” means staying alive long enough to be rescued and returned to your culture, or make it out of a life-threatening situation, back to your culture. The key component that defines a “survival situation” is that you have been removed from the safety, security, routine provided by your culture. Without that culture (of food production, shelter from the elements, clean sources of water, etc.) you will die. Life without culture is uncomfortable and hard. It’s why humans became pack animals: strength in numbers. Survival skills are not meant to keep you alive indefinitely (this is why survival is uncomfortable and undesirable), they are meant to keep you alive just long enough. Survivalism (aka Prepping) is a subculture of people preparing for a crisis. It is a culture of survivalists, who carry the mentality of survival. It is a short term crisis plan of action, not a long term cultural commitment to the land. They can’t see beyond the culture of civilization, and so prepare for its return after an emergency, rather than creating a more resilient culture.

Hunter-gatherers did not live in constant state of survival. Rather, they had (and still have today–where they persist in spite of civilization’s genocidal lunacy) an intricate, comforting culture. They have seasonal routines of food procurement and production. They don’t have to wander in search of food, they know exactly where their food is. They know how to stay dry and warm, and have proper shelters and clothing that match weather fluctuations in their bioregions. They don’t have to make everything from scratch all the time (such as a fire making kit), the way a survivalist does. They are not living in a crisis of starvation and discomfort (though they are facing eradication from civilization, but that is a separate issue). First world people who grow up with hot showers and a McDonalds on every corner imagine that living without their iPhone constitutes a survival situation.

Rewilding is about returning to a hunter-gatherer lifeway, in its wholeness. It is also focused on understanding the mechanisms of how civilization came about, how it domesticated us, and how to dismantle it and break through the barriers to the wild. Survival skills are a low priority to rewilding. Those recently introduced to rewilding will often focus on these, simply because they are still working through these myths and think the survival skillset is more relevant to rewilding than it really is. Ancestral living skills require more effort and energy than you would expend in a survival situation. These are things like hide-tanning, long term shelter building, bows & arrows, basket weaving, pottery, etc. Yet, rewilding is also more than learning ancestral living skills. It is more than learning to track animals and identify and process edible plants. It is more akin to learning to garden than learning to forage or hunt. Reciprocity with the land is not emphasized in survival skills. This is central to rewilding. Serving the land, living in reciprocity (rather than extraction), is what separates the wild from the domesticated. Survivalists are not concerned with reciprocity, they are in crisis mode and in need of rescue. Survivalism is a reflection of survival mentality: stockpiling canned food instead of relationships. Arming yourself with guns and self-defense weapons instead of the knowledge of how to live with the land, and in a community.

Over the years I have had many reality television shows contact me. Two of which wanted to make shows with me as the host. None of these ever panned out, because none of them really understood what rewilding was. They wanted me to go out and hunt with a bow and arrow, as though that was the ultimate aspect of rewilding. This frustrated me, and continues to do so today. Without a culture, you don’t have a wild existence. Rewilding is culture-building, not a solo activity in the woods. That’s certainly part of the rewilding journey, but it’s not the wholeness that makes rewilding, rewilding. It would have been easy for me to have sold out the vision of rewilding, and made a superficial show about picking berries in the woods and hunting with a bow and arrow, but I would have had to throw my integrity as a rewilder in the trash.

Survival instructor, author, and television star Cody Lundin, did a fantastic interview when he left “Dual Survivor.” In the interview Cody talks about how television survival shows are produced on a whim by unknowledgeable producers, and enthusiastic actors with a few skills. He calls these shows “Survival Entertainment.” The lack of real knowledge from the creators of these shows mean that the shows often don’t teach real survival skills. Sometimes they teach you to do really stupid things that will kill you. The best example is always the bow and arrow. Aside from being a survival skills instructor, Cody is a proficient primitive skills practitioner and hunter. The show’s premise is that they dump Cody and another guy in the woods and they must survive while making it back to civilization. Throughout his time on the show, the producers, knowing his skills, asked him to hunt with a primitive bow and arrow. Cody, a survival instructor and person with integrity, refused to do so, because bows and arrows have nothing to do with survival skills. If your goal was to make it to civilization alive, you would not care about food. You will not starve to death in a week, for example. Producers, actors, and the public conflate so much of these different fields, and take these skills out of their context, that they all get wrapped up into being the same thing. Here is a quote from Cody:

Modern survival is different from primitive living skills, which is different from urban preparedness, which is different from homesteading, which is different from wilderness living or “bushcrafting.” They all revolve around various aspects of self-reliance, just like all of the different doctors revolve around dealing with the human body. But one does not go to a foot doctor to remove a cataract. Even many survival instructors are unaware of the differences, and the media, not knowing the difference either, puts out whatever they think is valid.

We could easily add “rewilding” to Cody’s list. Although, while there are aspects of self-reliance within rewilding, it is founded on creating a community of resilience. I would add, similarly to Cody, that many rewilders are unaware of these differences as well. This isn’t to say that bows and arrows aren’t tools for rewilding, or that survival skills don’t overlap into the realm of rewilding. Obviously they are, and obviously they do. Many people come to rewilding by first getting into survivalism. The problem is that they draw focus to the superficial aspects of rewilding (the material culture) and away from the central themes, of how and why. If you are only looking at the superficial aspects, you’re missing the core elements of reciprocity, culture-building, resistance, and resilience. These are what separate survivalism and rewilding. While this may be more broadly appealing and draw a larger audience, it ceases to be rewilding, and instead, becomes a shell of rewilding. Which, to most people, looks a lot like survivalism.

Rewilding 101: “Prehistoric” Skills & Ideas for a More Resilient Future

I’m excited to teach a course called “Rewilding 101” through the Portland Underground Graduate School this coming month (November 2015). Check out the course details below:
rewilding 101

Class: SUNDAYS November 1, 8, 15 and 22, 10:30am-noon.

Space limited to 15 students.

The concept of rewilding, of un-doing the domestication of the last several thousand years, is gaining mainstream attention fast. Recent studies show that spending more time in nature, eating a “wilder” diet, and planting back native ecosystems is beneficial to human health and the health of the environment. But this is not an “ancestral skills” class. Rather, we’ll focus on the ideological side, the hows and whys of rewilding, along with its ecological, anthropological, and psychological principles. You’ll learn the myths we’ve constructed about prehistoric peoples, the problems that came with the innovation of agricultural civilization, and the benefits of indigenous horticulture. We will look at the barriers that stand in the way of rewilding, the various ways in which people are rewilding, how to rewild in a way to that is respectful to indigenous populations, and how it is shaping up in the mainstream.

You will:

  • Learn how rewilding improves quality of life and how it helps us understand humanity’s ancient strategies of interacting with the land and each other.
  • Gain awareness of the social and environmental hazards that arise with civilization.
  • Examine the various groups that are rewilding around the world and how you can follow their lead.

Week 1: Exploring Prehistory. What is “pre” history, and why should we care about it? What is our “common knowledge” of cavemen? Plus, we’ll review a timeline of human evolution.

Week 2: Defining Rewilding. What is our concept of ideas like “wild” and “wilderness”? How are people using the term “rewilding”? How do hunter-gatherers change the landscape? We’ll also start to look at things like land access and how it pertains to Native Americans.

Week 3: Hazards of Rewilding. We’ll address cultural appropriation and privilege and how they relate to rewilding.

Week 4: Rewilding in Action. What does rewilding look like? What are some barriers to rewilding? We’ll look at examples of current rewilders and see possibilities for rewilding in the future.

WHEN
WHERE
Southeast Uplift (Fireside Room) – 3534 Southeast Main Street Portland, OR 97214

 

 

Anarchy Radio w/ John Zerzan and Kevin Tucker

3261945045_2c445e91c3_b

This week I went down to Eugene to chat with John Zerzan and Kevin Tucker on Anarchy Radio. We had a really good talk. Check it out here:

https://archive.org/details/AnarchyRadio10062015

(photo credit: https://www.flickr.com/photos/eflon/)

What is Rewilding Presentation

Here is the video of the slideshow that I gave at the Rewild Portland spring fundraiser this last April. Learn more about what rewilding means to us, and how and what we are doing to make it happen!

PDX Darlings Podcast with Martha Grover

Doomstead Diner Interview

Years ago as I was winding down from blogging, the Doomstead Diner folks asked me to do an interview. We finally got around to doing it! I don’t often get doomy and gloomy, but there is a time and place to talk seriously about the scary possibilities (and probabilities) that the future holds. The Doomstead Diner is just such a place, and the podcasts are great. This was a really fun conversation. Check it out:

unnamed

Interview on Unlearn and Rewild Podcast

Greener Good Show

I was on this local cable access show called the Greener Good talking about my basket weaving projects.

Permaculture Podcast Interview #1

Rewilding, Dispatched

For years now I’ve had a google alert set up for the word “Rewilding.” I like to check the pulse of how the mainstream is perceiving it, as well as the multiple permutations that it has taken between conservation biology, and humans returning to hunter-gatherer lifeways and culture (and the inevitable merging of the two that will take place at some point). I was surprised one day when I was alerted to a news article about a racehorse in Europe named “Rewilding.” For a long time I followed Rewilding’s success. Horse races are disturbing to me. Still, I wondered if it was a sign; should I “bet it all on Rewilding?” In spite of the horrible animal cruelty of horse races, I loved getting headlines that began, “Rewilding Takes Clear Victory…” Was the universe telling me something?

One sad day I got an e-mail alert. Rewilding had been running full speed when his leg bones buckled and turned to jello. He fell under the weight of a useless leg and had to be euthanized right there on the race track. Upon reading this I burst into tears. I cried and cried. I was inconsolable. It was silly really. Yes, it was sad the horse died. Yes, it is sad that horses are forced into this kind of performance slavery for human entertainment. But beyond that, I had psychologically projected the essence of the rewilding renaissance into the success of a racehorse as though it were some mystical metaphor. For that reason, I was heart broken when Rewilding was dispatched.

Projecting an idea onto a specific set of sounds we call a word, in this case the cultural movement of returning to ancestral lifeways, I am always disappointed when the system kills it. Horse races by nature are disgusting and exploitive of horses. Just as civilization, capitalism, and empire are exploitive of humans, and their ideas. I am similarly heart broken when I see an idea as ripe as rewilding, as deeply needed as rewilding, grasped up, beaten into submission, and forced to parade around as something it is not in order for someone to make a dime. The meaning of rewilding maimed, destroyed, dispatched.

…Which is why lately I have been considering changing my name to Peter Rejuvilicious, culturally appropriating a folk medicinal practice that has been disproven by science, bottling it and selling it to wealthy white people with orthorexia for $250 a pop–and all the while calling it rewilding. In phase two of this new master plan, I will write an e-book that is just a rehash of every wilderness survival skills book out on the market. I will market it as the Survival Bible and call it “The Surbible.” Oh by the way, I just trademarked that. It’s now SURBIBLE™. It comes totally free when you subscribe to my spam service.

surbible rewilding with peter michael bauer

In case you can’t tell… that last paragraph was satire.

As more and more people over the last few years have begun using (and abusing) the term “rewilding,” I’ve been thinking a lot about the rise in its popular use as the latest buzzword. Nothing is more frustrating than to see people co-opt the term from the rewilding community and water it down (usually for their own commercial purposes). On top of that, I get insulted when I see people clearly copying my work and the works of other rewilding catalysts. It’s even more insulting when those people act like they invented the term, but don’t even understand where it came from, what it means, and fail to honor those who have been doing it for a long time.

In my book Rewild or Die (2008), I wrote briefly of how I came to the word rewilding. I didn’t go into much detail, but after looking at this I’ve realized how important lineage is to me, and so I feel the need to share it with you. When I found the word rewilding, it was a subpage on a (now-defunct) webpage (www.greenanarchy.info) of a particular anarchist ideology called Anarcho-Primitivism. The site described the concept of rewilding in a single paragraph. This paragraph described the entirety of the lifeway of rewilding:

For most green/anti-civilization/primitivist anarchists, rewilding and reconnecting with the earth is a life project. It is not limited to intellectual comprehension or the practice of primitive skills, but instead, it is a deep understanding of the pervasive ways in which we are domesticated, fractured, and dislocated from our selves, each other, and the world, and the enormous and daily undertaking to be whole again. Rewilding has a physical component which involves reclaiming skills and developing methods for a sustainable co-existence, including how to feed, shelter, and heal ourselves with the plants, animals, and materials occurring naturally in our bioregion. It also includes the dismantling of the physical manifestations, apparatus, and infrastructure of civilization. Rewilding has an emotional component, which involves healing ourselves and each other from the 10,000 year-old wounds which run deep, learning how to live together in non-hierarchical and non-oppressive communities, and deconstructing the domesticating mindset in our social patterns. Rewilding involves prioritizing direct experience and passion over mediation and alienation, re-thinking every dynamic and aspect of our reality, connecting with our feral fury to defend our lives and to fight for a liberated existence, developing more trust in our intuition and being more connected to our instincts, and regaining the balance that has been virtually destroyed after thousands of years of patriarchal control and domestication. Rewilding is the process of becoming uncivilized. -www.greenanarchy.info

Rewilding was about a new way of living, a new story to live by. I don’t know who wrote this beautiful paragraph, but thank you (If you find this page and contact me, I will give you proper credit if you so desire). On this site, there was a link to the (now-defunct) website, www.rewild.org. On their website, they had a definition of rewilding:

rewild v. to heal from domestication & rejoin the community of nature; redefining a relationship with nature on nature’s terms; to return an area to a more natural or wild state; to return a captive animal to its natural habitat.

Though I found this definition online, I believe it was first written by the people who wrote the zine Reclaim, Rewild, who also later created rewild.org. I believe these are the same folks who founded the Wildroots Collective, but am not sure about that detail. 2004 was a big year for human rewilding. Along with this zine, John Zerzan’s Green Anarchy Magazine published an issue dedicated to the topic. I loved this definition. However, it felt too long. I shortened it in a way that I thought would encompass all of the main points. Also, it had no synonyms that would help people understand the word even more. I had a t-shirt with the definition of “unschooling” on it, that included a few synonyms to help people grasp the concept (my favorite was “auto-didact”). This gave me the idea to add synonyms to the definition of rewilding. The definition I came up with was this:

rewild, v : to return to a more natural or wild state; the process of undoing domestication. Synonyms: undomesticate, uncivilize.

My edits to the definition didn’t change the original, core idea. I created www.rewild.info (now living at www.rewild.com), an online forum for discussing rewilding. I put this definition on the “splash page“. At the time there were many bloggers venturing into the territory of rewilding. The three people who had blogs entirely dedicated to rewilding and who had written the most, were me (under the moniker Urban Scout), Jason Godesky (Tribe of Anthropik), and Willem Larsen (College of Mythic Cartography), later Wilderix (Rix White), Miles Olsen, and Penny Scout (Emily Porter). People started linking to the forum and within a few months there were many conversations going on about rewilding. Finisia Medrano’s web master linked up with us and all the hoopsters began influencing the direction the subculture was taking. Pretty soon the conversations became super “advanced” and we required new people to read up on rewilding before beginning to have conversations there, so we wouldn’t have to tread over the same ground, but could keep building on what we already had in order to go deeper and deeper.

It seemed as we went along, that the definition on the front page was too vague for people who were new. In one of my blogs I tried to articulate the definition to be more obvious to new people, and offered this:

Rewild, v; to foster and maintain a sustainable way of life through hunter-gatherer-gardener social and economical systems; including, but not limited to, the encouragement of social, physical, spiritual, mental and environmental biodiversity and the prevention and undoing of social, physical, spiritual, mental and environmental domestication and enslavement.

No one was ever happy with this, as rewilding is something so deep, and requires so much work undoing the mythology that our culture has pounded into our heads about indigenous and “primitive” people. This definition wasn’t meant to take the place of the simplistic one, but to augment it: un-doing domestication means abandoning civilization. Abandoning civilization requires a revolution. Rewilding is a renaissance that requires a revolution. It is a movement that addresses environmental destruction and social injustice simultaneously. This has been articulated by many rewilders, including myself. Though, for a couple years there, I, as Urban Scout, was the loudest proponent of rewilding on the web and in the press. Most friends of mine understood what I was doing with the persona of Urban Scout; hipsterfying the aesthetics of rewilding, but without sugar-coating or changing the ideology behind it–putting it in a shell that the mainstream would accept more readily. Those who didn’t get the satire sent me angry private and public messages. Kevin Tucker, a prominent Anarcho-primitivist (and author of For Wildness and Anarchy), wrote me this e-mail:

Scout,
You and the other ‘primitivist’ bloggers are fucking douche bags. I’ll give you credit for having a sense of humor, but then you err on that side. Trying to make rewilding just some new hipster shit is pathetic. You’re selling yourself and no one who will still be around in a few years will have bought it. Benefits for fucking fashion shows and dance parties? I imagine you might mean well, appealing to other hipsters or what-the-fuck ever, but you’re only making a mockery of yourself. Perhaps that’s your intent? Urban Scout is, after all, just a character right? Fucking PATHETIC. The rantings, daily affairs, and love life of a fringe blogger do not constitute a primitivist site. The sooner you realize that the better off we’ll be when the hype fades and y’all stop trying to co-opt valid shit. 
For wildness and ANARCHY,
Kevin Tucker.

I’m certain he is still proud of it to this day, and wouldn’t mind me reprinting it here, as we are friends now (after I reached out years later because after going back and reading through our exchanged I agreed with a lot of his criticisms). Kevin didn’t know me personally or see Urban Scout as an expression of authenticity because he didn’t understand the satire. I always thought that they mostly hated me for aesthetic purposes. I didn’t look like one of them; I was a “hipster.” Back then I would throw this kind of thing back in people’s faces. I turned his e-mail into a Madlibs-style contest, in which the winner of my choosing would receive a signed photograph of yours truly. Looking back I just roll my eyes at that whole thing.

He was wrong though. I didn’t co-opt rewilding. Co-opting implies changing the meaning behind something for your own purposes. I was just giving rewilding a superficial change, a quasi-hip facelift. Not an ideological one. Now, though, I think I actually understand where their frustration with me was coming from. The hipster culture I was appealing to was centered around an obsession with novelty. This is part of our culture at large, but was especially true (and still is) of hipster culture. Urban Scout (from the audiences perspective) was simply just another novelty to be consumed, like Jack White recording an ICP album of Mozart covers. Urban Scout, the hipster, made rewilding appear as a novelty. Seeing this now, I understand why those who hold these ideas close to their hearts, were pissed off at me. In spite of this, many people were able to see through the hipster facade and satirical aspects, and understand the sincerity and deeper meanings of rewilding. In fact, a graduate student from Indiana, that I had never met before, wrote a dissertation on how activists use language to recruit people. She included a chapter on “Anarcho-primitivism” and wrote this:

In these mock-mainstream encounters, anarcho-primitivists revel in the contradiction between mass media spectacle and primitivist sentiment. By using blogs, YouTube, and red carpet events, they acknowledge the success of corporate, technological strategies of “selling” ideologies, and they insist that their anti-technological perspective can best be spread through the media that they hope to destroy. When they announce their simultaneous love and disdain for E! Entertainment Network’s brand of consumerism, primitivists produce a critique of the media while guarding themselves against co-optation. Because they produce slick, shiny promotional materials, the mass media has no need to alter the anarcho-primitivist message if it wants to sell it. Urban Scout can therefore have quite a bit of say in his own public representation. As long as his images look professional and corporate, they will appear as he created them.

In 2008 I compiled my “Philosophy of Rewilding” blogs into a book called Rewild or Die, but didn’t publish it officially until 2010, all the while adding updates to the book. In 2011 I finally went on a West coast book tour. During the tour my car was totaled by people who were angry with things I had written in the book and on my blog. Originally I thought that it was anarchist vegans who were mad that I wrote about veganism in my book. The reality is that I don’t know the exact person who did it, so blaming members of a subculture seems counter-productive. The point of mentioning it here, is that it shocked me. I wasn’t born with a thick skin. On my blog I acted as though things didn’t bother me, but they did. I realized that life in the lime light, and one where I am inciting people to total my car, is not the one for me. After my book tour I basically stopped blogging altogether and I’ve spent the last few years creating Rewild Portland, a local non-profit dedicated to creating a rewilding community in my home town of Portland, OR. Rather than be snarky on the internet, I’ve been sincere in person (and a little snarky).

(A side note to this, is the problem with commercializing aspects of rewilding at all, including my non-profit Rewild Portland. For example: charging money for classes, books, information, community, etc. That is a related matter, but is the topic of a whole other conversation. If you are interested in continuing that conversation, join in on it!)

Others published works as well. Finisia Medrano published an auto-biography (Growing Up in Occupied America). Willem Larsen published a collection of his blogs (College of Mythic Cartography). Rewilder Miles Olsen, wrote a book Unlearn, Rewild (New Society, 2012) and used the definition I created for the Rewild Forums in it. In his book, Miles failed to credit me or any other rewilders. In fact, his book doesn’t even have a bibliography. In a private e-mail exchange with me, he agreed to modify the book to include acknowledgements if the book has a second printing. Miles’ book is great, and he was one of the first people to contribute to join the Rewild Forums and shape the conversations there. You should definitely check out his book if you haven’t already.

Many of us who made this initial online push for rewilding haven’t had time to pay much attention to the online world of rewilding for the last two or three years. The rewild forums quieted down for a while without a core group of people driving conversations. We had all talked about it enough, and went to work to rewild our lives in the physical world.

In the last year or so there have been a few websites popping up with people claiming to be “rewilding” but gutting the meaning of it, and using it as a new buzzword for anything “Paleo.” It has been confusing, because some are even using the word as a synonym for just going on a hike in “nature.” As if “un-doing domestication” simply means sitting at the base of a waterfall for 15 minutes a day. It’s even *more* confusing when you look at the most commonly known definition of rewilding, and that is actually conservation rewilding, which explicitly excludes humans (also off-topic but interesting, and is probably the origin of the term in popular use). Human rewilding is the kind we are referring to.

A couple of these people have even become internet famous through modern internet marketing campaigns, seemingly plagiarizing cherry-picked elements of the conversations from the Rewild Forums. All the while, failing to give any of us any credit or linking to any of the websites. Lineage is important to follow because it keeps people on track with the growth of a movement. What is most disturbing about this trend is that it mis-directs what rewilding means from the larger subculture of rewilding, and attempts to close it off in a vacuum of self help routines. Though these sites may add to elements of rewilding culture, they do not add to the rewilding culture overall, but in fact are reducing it by deluding the goal from walking away from civilization (and/or dismantling civilization) to simply taking in a breath of fresh air at the park, or walking in synthetic “barefoot” shoes. With free e-books on things like, “10 Simple Things You Can Do To Rewild” none of which include returning to a hunter-gatherer way of life, or challenging the pervasive hierarchical culture that is destroying the planet. Rich people have always been more active in nature, now they get to be smug about how healthy they are for it.

It is strange that these people would use the word rewilding, without doing some research.These are internet-based businesses. Google “rewilding” and the rewilding wikipedia page and rewild forums are in the top hits. It’s hard to imagine they did no research into a word that they would be using as part of their brand. The wikipedia page of rewilding is listed under a subsection of anarchy. Yet these sites have no ties to the driving analysis that begat rewilding, or the culture surrounding it. It is hard to miss that there is a radical foundation to a topic, even with minimal effort. One of the reasons I take major offense to this (other than lack of credit, changing the frame and goal) is that tacking the term “rewilding” onto a capitalist venture of “self-help,” that only benefits the rich (and mostly white), is simply bad publicity for the rewilding movement. People who are doing actual rewilding (the kind that benefits the entire planet, not just a muscle grouping in your abs) such as: planting back wild foods, assisting Natives in land reclamation, bringing these skills and ideas to communities of color, and communities with economic disparities, will be discredited. It’s bad publicity because it makes it look to the general public as if rewilding is just something for self-absorbed, rich, white people, who just want to look good naked, rather than a cultural movement for all people to reclaim an ancestral lifeway of serving the earth through the tending of the wild–with any means necessary. It’s the intention, the goal, that is important here.

You don’t go to a tree sit to climb trees, you go to a tree-sit to stop a logging operation. There is a purpose beyond self. Rewilding, like tree-sitting (protecting wild spaces by any means necessary is another aspect of rewilding) is rooted in a purpose beyond the self. So, the idea of “rewilding yourself” is a misnomer. Rewilding isn’t about YOU. You’re mental and physical health are important… just as breathing, eating, and sleeping are important. Rewilding isn’t some narcissistic, masturbatory meditation, health, or fitness program. It’s about serving the community of life and the land, in the face of Empire.

These people are climbing trees for fun and calling it tree-sitting. Yes, climbing trees is important for participating in a tree sit, but it’s not the goal. There are people on a facebook page for one of the websites that ask “Why is the wikipedia page for rewilding listed as a subsection of anarchism.” This is akin to “Wait, I didn’t know we we’re learning to climb trees in order to stop a logging operation?!?” It is clear from statements like these that the meaning of rewilding is being lost of these people. Anti-civilization, anti-empire, and anarchy (in the general meaning of a “stateless” culture that self-governs) are at the root of rewilding. Rewilding originated from social and environmental activism, not the survival skills world, not the dieting world, and not the new age meditation world. The core of rewilding has always been about planting back seeds (actual seeds) for a future beyond our own. The children of our future (if there are any) won’t care how good we looked naked, they will care if we planted food for them to eat. Of course, we need to take care of ourselves in order to do awesome rewilding stuff like planting back seeds on the hoop, so nourishing traditions are things we need to focus on, but they are not the reason for the season.

I would say that if your objective is to live a hunter-gatherer lifestyle to the fullest extent possible, then you are rewilding. If you are just doing paleo diet and going camping to feel healthier, that is not rewilding. I didn’t make up this definition, though I have played a role in crafting the culture that surrounds it. This is just what it means to the culture of people who are attempting to walk away from civilization and create something new. Why do definitions matter? People must have a shared reality in order to work together in that reality. I once got into the most insane arguments with a man who refused to share reality with me, claiming that “nothing is real” and that “there are no such thing as facts”. These arguments looked like little more than philosophical masturbation to me, than practical thinking for taking actions to create a sustainable planet. While I agreed in the philosophical sense with him, it didn’t help anyone to make choices in the real world.While I don’t believe in the concept of “facts” I do believe that we need to have shared observations of reality. We can observe that agriculture destroys the soil. If we can’t have that shared reality, we can’t work together to change our subsistence strategy to one that builds soil. Similarly, if we can’t have a shared reality of what it means to rewild, the word might as well mean nothing at all. The more we clearly define an idea, the easier time we will have using it for practical purposes. If you don’t have “planting back” the land (reciprocal land management strategies) listed as the main “fundamental” of rewilding (the main thing that separates indigenous lifeways from civilized), then you haven’t been at it very long and are just bringing the same concepts of civilized mentality-> rendering the term “rewilding” into just more of the same. For this reason, it is easy to tell who is new to rewilding and who has been at it for a long time based on where they put their emphasis. Agricultural civilization takes more from the land without giving anything back, whereas “hunter-gatherers” give back more than they take. A simple example of this is taking a single Camas bulb from the ground, but planting dozens of camas seeds in its place. Newbie rewilders tend to emphasize primitive skills, foraging, and enact the individualistic “mountain man” cliche, which is missing the whole point of rewilding. Foraging is not rewilding. Foraging, while planting back the seeds of the plants you are foraging, and under the threat of Empire, is rewilding.

The last chapter in my book was called, “Rewilding: a Term to Throw Away.” In it I spoke of how the word could change over time to become something else, and lose sight of the goal. The vision is what is important, not the word. We were rewilding before “rewilding” was a word to describe rewilding. It doesn’t really matter if these people continue to run the word rewilding into the ground. If people are alive in 500 years, it’s because they will have returned to a hunter-gatherer way of life. In the moment though, as someone trying to prepare people for the changes we are experiencing by uniting them under a common term, it is really, really annoying.

Bulletin of Primitive Technology #48, Fall 2014

The fall issue of the Bulletin of Primitive Technology is out and has an article in it that I wrote about processing Blackberry Bark for weaving. Learn more or order issues at their website: www.btprimitives.com

9787_794289120634827_420875975612594603_n